"I have been analyzing American history in the
light of what I have called structural deep events: events, like the JFK
assassination, the Watergate break-in,
9/11, which repeatedly involve
law-breaking or violence, are mysterious to begin with, are embedded in ongoing
covert processes, have political consequences that enlarge covert government,
and are subsequently covered up by systematic falsifications in the mainstream
media and internal government records." - Peter Dale Scott
"Key congressional leaders say they didn't know
George Walker Bush
established a "shadow government," moving dozens of senior civilian managers to
secret underground locations outside Washington to ensure that the federal
government could survive a devastating terrorist attack on the nation's
capital" - Washington Post, Saturday
It is becoming increasingly
apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in
accordance with the US Constitution, or, within states, according to state
constitutions. While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the
rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence
to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still
cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of
the institutions of society, the courts, the press, and
law enforcement agencies, still
largely comply with the Constitution and
the law in important matters.
They expect that these corrupting forces
are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance
Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is
far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the US
Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only
as a façade to deceive and placate the masses. What has replaced it is
what many call the Shadow Government. It still, for the most part, operates in
secret, because its control is not secure. The exposure of this regime and its
operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the
Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to
Abdulrahman Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated while eating dinner by a CIA drone
airstrike in Yemen on October 14, 2011.
Anwar al-Awlaki, an
American/Yemeni imam and Islamic lecturer, was assassinated by an armed CIA
drone two weeks prior to the death of his son.
daughter, Nawar, is thought to have been fatally shot in intelligence operation
on al-Qa`ida that left at least 14 people, including a US commando,
intellectuals envision a prolonged
cold war against Al Qaeda, with hot wars along the way. It happens that the
Long War is over Muslim lands rich with oil, natural gas and planned pipelines.
" - Tom Hayden
|"Without public debate and
without congressional hearings, a segment of the Pentagon and fellow travelers
have embraced a doctrine known as the Long War, which projects an "arc of
instability" caused by insurgent groups from Europe to South Asia that will
last between 50 and 80 years. According to one of its engineers, Iraq,
Pakistan are just "small wars in the midst
of a big one." - Tom Hayden
|"Last October, senior
Obama officials anonymously unveiled to the Washington Post their newly minted
"disposition matrix", a complex computer system that will be used to determine
how a terrorist suspect will be "disposed of": indefinite detention,
prosecution in a real court, assassination-by-CIA-drones, etc."
- Glenn Greewald
1960 There are more police officers than hired security guards
Nixon appoints Donald Henry Rumsfeld
to head the Office of Economic Opportunity, which was responsible for
overseeing the "War on Poverty".
Nixon wanted the agency restructured, and
Donald Henry Rumsfeld, with
the assistance of his chief aide,
Bruce Cheney, quickly began bringing in management contractors to do the
work of the agency's top civil servants.
"Don found himself
with a bureaucracy that hated him. He was forced to seek outside help. I
remember Don reciting to me the Al Smith statement, 'If I don't look to my
friends for help, who do I look to, my enemies?'" -
Frank Carlucci succeeds Donald Henry Rumsfeld and later becomes Defense
secretary for Ronald
1971 Frank Carlucci tells Congress
that he is dramatically curtailing the agency's spending on management
"We did not think we were getting our money's worth." -
1976 Daniel Guttman and Barry
Willner write The Shadow Government.
Decision-making authority as well as actual services are being outsourced to
high-priced consultants, secretive think tanks, and corporate vested interests
- accountable to no one! Using a process' cloaked in contractual and other
formal approvals by the various executive departments a drive to merge
government and business interests began as early as 1969.
Reagan created a presidential commission on privatization to study how the
boundary between public and private might be erased giving private interests
more opportunity to move into traditionally government roles. The same idea
surfaces in the "re-inventing government" movement taken up by the Bill Clinton
administration: "We would do well," one proponent wrote, "to glory in the
blurring of public and private and not keep trying to draw a disappearing line
in the water."
Privatization has affected every aspect of American
public life since then. The most visible surge in government outsourcing has
come in the realm of the military. Purportedly acute manpower shortages has
America hiring private companies to perform duties reserved in the past for the
American military. America now has over 40 corporations that provide
Nearly every facet of "personal security" is now in the
hands of private business.
2003 3,512 security contracts for domestic security functions.
2006 In the 22 month period ending in August the
Department of Homeland Security has issued more than 115,000 security related
It was not until the mid19th century that America's
urban governments, by setting up local police forces, began to make an ordinary
person's safety a matter of state responsibility. No one with wealth relies on
state guarantees of security any longer. People have wealth have withdrawn into
protected walled enclaves.
One of the chief
obligations of any
government is simply to dispense justice - to resolve disputes, oversee legal
business, mete out punishment. These functions were once held in private hands.
After a stint as a social responsibility, they are now migrating back. Lawyers
and clients increasingly shun the civil courts - congested, expensive, fickle -
and instead buy themselves some private arbitration, provided by a growing
cadre of profitable "rent a judge" companies.
As for the criminal
justice system, those sentenced to prison may very well do their time in a
private facility, run on behalf of state and federal governments and operated
by a company with some former public official in its management to grease the
wheels. Faced with rising numbers of inmates, and unwilling to raise taxes to
build more public prisons, governments at all levels have found that the easy,
cost effective way is to turn the prison industry over to the private sector -
companies such as the behemoth Nashville based Corrections Corporation of
America's public colleges and universities are fast losing
their public character. These institutions were created under the terms of an
act signed by Abraham Lincoln in 1862, providing federal
land grants to the states as a basis
for public financing of higher education. Nationwide, state legislatures are
picking up only about two-thirds of the annual cost of public higher education.
For the University of Illinois, the figure is 25 percent. For the University of
Michigan, it's 18 percent.
What makes up the difference in funding? To
a large degree it's money from private donors and private corporations,
creating an incipient "academic-industrial complex" at public and private
institutions alike. At the University of California at Berkeley, one
administrator is officially known as the Bank of America Dean of the Haas School
of Business. Much money for universities comes with strings attached for
instance, the power to push research in certain directions and perhaps away
from others, and the ownership of patents deriving from sponsored research.
Sociologists have a term for what is occurring: they call it the
"externalization of state functions." Water and sewage systems are being
privatized, as are airports and highways and public hospitals. Voucher programs
and charter schools are a way of shifting education toward the private sector.
The protection of nuclear waste is in private hands. Meat inspection is done
largely by the meatpacking companies themselves. The privatization of terminal
operations at American ports began three decades ago and 80 percent of them
were already operated by foreign companies, the largest of which is Chinese.
Serious proposals to privatize portions of Social Security have been on
the table, and Obamacare effectively puts an enormous government program into
the hands of private insurance and drug companies. Many governmnet services now
charge user fees. Detailed statistical data were once freely available to
everyone as public information but now that information must be purchased ffrom
a private corporate public information provider.
The vaults of the
Smithsonian were once open to documentary film makers regardless of provenance
and financing. Now an agreement between the Smithsonian and the cable company
Showtime has created something called the Smithsonian Channel, which has
jurisdiction over, and priority access to, certain kinds of material.
considerable amount of tax collection is now done, in effect, by casinos;
rather than raise taxes to pay for services, legislatures legalize gambling and
then take a rake-off from the profits earned by private casino companies. It's
"tax farming" for the modern age, recalling the hated Roman practice of selling
the right to collect taxes to private individuals (including the apostle
Matthew in the Gospels), who were then allowed to keep anything over what they
had agreed to collect for the government.
As the recent revelations
about torture have made clear, even
official interrogations for
national security purposes have been outsourced - in this instance to other
countries through the process known as "extraordinary rendition."
sale of naming rights for public facilities and other amenities attracts notice
mostly for the ungainly nomenclature that results - mutants such as the
Mitsubishi Wild Wetland Trail, at the New York Botanical Garden, in the Bronx,
and Whataburger Field, in Corpus Christi.
To attract more corporate
underwriting, the Department of the Interior has proposed that America's
national parks be liberally opened up to the sale of naming rights. No one is
suggesting that there will soon be a J. Crew Cape Cod National Seashore. But
might there be a Sherwin-Williams Painted Desert Trailhead?
at Johns Hopkins observes, "Contractors have become so big and entrenched that
it's a fiction that the government maintains any control."
recent example is the rebuilding effort in
Iraq. There may have been no
alternative to giving the reconstruction job in Iraq to private corporations,
including giant combines such as Bechtel and
Halliburton, but the
result has been an effort that defies management or accountability. The
evidence of widespread corruption in the Iraq rebuilding effort is beyond
Corruption aside, private
companies are exempt from many regulations that would apply to government
agencies. The records of private companies can't be obtained through the
Freedom of Information Act. They can use foreign subsidiaries to avoid laws
meant to restrain American companies. Before the war,
Halliburton itself used
subsidiaries to do business with Iran,
Iraq, and Libya, despite
official American trade sanctions against all three countries.
more secret intelligence work translation, airborne surveillance,
computing, interrogation, analysis, reporting, briefingis being
outsourced to private entities. Not only is the intelligence community becoming
further fragmented, but, because the new jobs pay so well, a "spy drain" is
drawing officers out of the public sector and into the private market. The
drain isn't restricted to spies: at least 90 former top officials at the
Department of Homeland Security and the White House Office of Homeland Security
are now working for private companies in the domestic-security business.
Meanwhile, the government seems poised to turn the job of border police
over to multi-national contractors, a task that will in turn be subcontracted
out to dozens of smaller companies.
Northrop Grumman were
among the corporations submited bids to build a high-tech "virtual fence" along
the Mexican border, with an array of motion detectors, satellite monitors, and
aerial drones which Boeing eventually won.
A Homeland Security official conceded the abdication of government
leadership, saying to the corporation, "We're asking you to come back and tell
us how to do our business."
One study from the late 1990s suggests that
the "privatization rate" the rate at which public functions are being
outsourced is roughly doubling every year. On paper the federal
workforce nationwide, leaving the military aside, appears to total about two
million people. If you add in all the people in the private sector doing
essentially government jobs with federal grants and contracts, then the figure
rises by 10.5 million. The commercialization of government probably explains
why so many Washington entities are now referred to as shops: "lobby shop,"
"counterterrorism shop." There's no question that in certain ways the private
sector can outperform the public sector. Users of Federal Express, U.P.S., and
DHL would sooner renounce citizenship than go back to relying only on the US
Postal Service. The problem is the cumulative effect of privatization across
the board projected out over decades, over a century, over two
and the leaching of management capacity from government. The activities of
government are, in effect, being franchised out.
You can't help
lingering over the concept of "franchise." The word originally had to do with
notions of political freedom and social responsibility. Derived from the Old
French word franc, meaning "free," it later came to be associated with the most
fundamental political freedom of all: to exercise your franchise meant to
exercise your right to vote. Only much later, in the mid20th century, did
the idea of being granted "certain rights" acquire its commercial connotation:
the right to market a company's services or products, such as fried chicken or
Tupperware. Today, to have a franchise on something is in effect to have
control over it." - adapted from Cullen Murphy
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a new
perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of Life - a rational gnostic mystery religion based on reason which
requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church
buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a
personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit of the
knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has
enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are
spelled out in detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against
individuals due to their religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary the
intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world economic system,
corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military entertainment complex
and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered
behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on
cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.
social mores and values have declined precipitously over the last century as
the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power
rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general through corporate media
by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population
through prior corporate media psychological operations. The results have been
the destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do
not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of
a perfect world. Through distraction and
coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been
directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that
further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of
individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the
capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular
thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be
true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which
may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and
thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to,
re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been
throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the original writer with
the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to
the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information see:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved