"Useless laws weaken the necessary
"If you have ten thousand regulations, you
destroy all respect for the law."
"The more laws and restrictions there are, the
poorer the people become."
"A great many laws in a country, like many
physicians, is a sign of malady."
In 2008 there were 760,000 practicing lawyers in
In 2011 there were 1.22 million practicing
lawyers in America.
"Today more than 30 percent of the American
workforce needs a government license to work." - Chip Mellor 2/10
"To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey,
serves to bring all law into contempt."
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
"He who regulates everything by
more likely to arouse
vices than reform them."
"Anyone who compares the legal domains of our
society to those of the premodern state immediately becomes
aware of a tremendous and
ever-increasing contraction of formally unregulated social space." - Paul
"One of the greatest
delusions in the world is the hope that
the evils in this world are to be cured by
legislation." Thomas B. Reed
and scholars make highly controversial political
choices, but use the
ideology of legal reasoning
to make our institutions appear natural and our rules appear
neutral." - Joseph Singer
"The myth of a law distinct from substantive value
is used to smuggle in the values of
the ruling class." -
"As the letter of the law swells in exactitude and
scope, the spirit of the law withers away and its power to control human behavior diminishes." -
"Powerful private interests seized control
of our government roughly 100 years ago and have methodically used that control
to expand the reach of government until it's invaded every area of our lives.
Our country was founded on the ideal of maximum freedom from government has
turned into the exact opposite. We literally have millions of rules,
regulations and statutes to define every minute detail of what we can and can't
do. I'd like to make a distinction between legal and lawful. When I think of
lawful I think of right and just. When I think of legal I think of deliberately
convoluted language written to get away with something a person shouldn't get
away with." - Bruce McDonald
Law is defined as:jurisprudence
way of tribal
adherence to tradition
codified social organizing
principles of equitiable
a dictum having absolute unquestioned authority
or agent responsible for enforcing social order
generalization based on
observation of consistent
code of principles
based on morality, conscience, and
The body of rules of conduct inherent
in human nature and essential to the binding of human society.
body of principles or precepts held to
express the Soul of the Creator and
Sustainer known as the Word or the Logos.
The body of rules and principles
governing the affairs of a
community and enforced by a binding political authority
An organic rule, as in
the Charter for Compassion, establishing and defining the conditions of the
existence of an organized community or social culture.
A statement describing a
relationship observed to be invariable between or
among phenomena for all cases
in which the specified conditions are met.
In general, a rule of
being or of conduct,
established by an authority able to enforce its will; a controlling
regulation; the mode or order according to which an agent or a power
The rules of construction, or of procedure,
conforming to the conditions of
success; a principle, maxim; or usage; as, the
laws of poetry, of architecture, of courtesy, or of
The Will of the
Creator and Sustainer as the rule for the disposition and conduct of all
responsible beings toward
each other and toward Creation; a rule of
living, conformable to
rule of action as obligatory on the
conscience or moral nature.
A rule of
being, operation, or
change, so certain and constant that it is
conceived of as imposed by the Will of the Creator and
Sustainer as a controlling authority; as, the
law of gravitation; the
laws of motion;
the laws of heredity;
the laws of thought; the laws of cause and effect; the law of
The Natural Law or
the Law of God is the Will
of the Creator and Sustainer as to human conduct, founded on the
moral difference of things, and discoverable by natural light (Rom. 1:20; 2:14,
15). This law binds all men at all
US Code traces back to Roman civil law, which in turn
can be traced back to Babylonian law
- the codified civil law system adopted by the
In code type
legal systems - as opposed to Mosaic law, Natural Law or Common law systems - moral
principles of right and wrong are
replaced by conceptual precepts (statutes, rules, regulations).
of right and wrong are not considered
and legal outcomes are determined by laws designed and enacted by man - even
when those laws may be opposed to Natural
Law or the Laws of God.
Invariably in code type legal systems, such legal systems develop at
least two separate classes of persons - the governed and those who govern. For
reasons of commercial efficiency and expediency such code type legal systems
deal in the fiction of man made social law.
Code type legal systems are
unconcerned about the collateral damage to the living and breathing individuals
affected by their operations whereas legal systems based upon
Natural Law are concerned with
right and wrong - actual reality as
opposed to an ideologically conceptualized
"What is hateful to you, do
not to your fellow men. 1. The Rule of Natural Law.
Natural Law governs each and every
That is the entire Law; all the rest is
2. Unalienable Rights.
Natural things are in their nature unalienable. Artifacts may be unalienable in
consequence of particular provisions in codified social law forbidding their
encumberment, as in Nationl Park system. The Natural Right of life, liberty,
and prosperity (adequate care for the
physical body) are unalienable. - Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856
3. Equality. Each human being arises from Nature. Each and every
Eternal Soul granted animated Life by the
Creator and Sustainer collaborates with other Souls to sustain life, liberty,
and prosperity for the physical bodies
of each and every Eternal Soul . People have
misundertood the principle of equality throughout history due to
the propaganda of psychopathic
4. Social compact of
of each and every Soul. Legitimate government is established when a group of
Souls band together to secure their Creator and Sustainer granted Unalienable
Rights. The State exists only to serve the
as it derives its power from the consent of the governed Souls.
Limited government. Legitimate government is purposed for the protection of the
Unalienable Rights and Personal Liberties of the Souls it serves.
The right to reform existing governing structures. Souls have a right to reform
governing structures when government fails to provide opportunity for adequate
care of the physical body. In other words, a civil government may not redesign
itself according to the will of a faction of Souls without the acceptance of
"Law must be free from
discrimination. Law must
apply to all, and not merely to particular persons or groups. Law must be
certain. Law must consist in the enforcement of known rules. These rules must
be general and abstract rather than
specific and concrete. They must be so clear that court
decisions are predictable. In brief,
the law must be certain, general, and equal." - Friedrich August von Hayek
"We saw that the white man did not take his
religion any more seriously than he did his laws, that he keeps both of them just behind him,
like helpers, to use when they might do him good. These are not our
ways. We keep the
laws we make, and we
live our religion. We have never understood the white man, who
fools no one but himself." - Chief Plenty Coups
of the Crow
mythmakers reconstructed the story of
human origins, humans appeared in the world with the frontal lobes required for
socialization but of course no experience.
the mythmakers humans soon discovered the
obvious benefits of communal life, and from there the course of "civilization" was set.
grew into towns, towns grew into cities, cities grew into kingdoms, kingdoms
One would expect to find that laws existed long before
literacy, but this appears not to have been the case.
If legal codes had been formulated orally and
embedded within the Oral
Tradition in preliterate times, then the earliest writings would surely
have been transcriptions of these laws -- but no such laws are found in these
writings, instead we find the narratives of
mythmakers or we find lists of
In fact, the earliest written code of law, the
Code of Hammurabi, dates to only
about 2100 B.C.E. 10,000 years ago members of Homo sapiens had been moving
outward from their African birthplace for more than 100,000 years and had
literally reached every corner of the world. By 10,000 years ago, the Near
East, Europe, Asia, Australia, and the New World had all been occupied by
modern humans for at least 20,000 years.
East was among the most densely populated areas of the world -- densely
populated, that is, by
peoples, such as were found everywhere in the world at that time and such as
are found still today where they've been allowed to survive. The founders of
Wetiko culture didn't live in an empty world,
they were a
people surrounded by many other
people studied in the history of anthropology had a complete set of customs and
traditions applicable to their environment and their unique mode of survival.
The name of the tribe in which the
Wetiko approach to living is long
forgotten but we know that
predatory global consumer culture model we see in use today orginated in the
organizational structure of the Imperial
State of Rome under Constantine.
Each tribe was
defined by its own traditions and customs, or laws. These defined the
parameters of tribal life. There was
literally no other way to tell them apart.
between tribes were impenetrable. A member of one tribe simply can't just decide one day to become a
member of another tribe; such a thing is quite unthinkable among tribal peoples
everywhere in the world.
At this time some of these tribal peoples were
farmers and some were hunter-gatherers. There's nothing at all unusual about
finding the two living side by side. We know that the practices of
Wetiko revolution began when
the farmers turned to monoculture for their Empire. Their invention was a new
style of agriculture -- the totalitarian style. And once applied to the plants
on the land why not apply it to
Everyone needed to conform to the
Wetiko revolution's style of
living for the Empire to flourish.
The concept of conformity was a
remarkable unprecedented idea. By forcing everyone to adopt common behavioral
patterns the individual traditions of tribal
life faded into irrelevance except as a way to honor ancestors. The
traditions and customs of each culture ceased to exist within this monocultural
collective designed to serve Empire.
Since tribal traditions or law had
been rendered obsolete, nothing remained now but to begin to invent new laws
This is of course a startling idea, the idea that laws could be
anything but invented because they were always handed down from the beginning.
Tribal law are never seen as invented laws, they're always received laws.
Tribal laws are never the work of committees of living individuals, they're
always the work of social evolution. Tribal laws are shaped the way a bird's
beak is shaped, or a mole's claw -- by what works. They never reflect a tribe's
concern for what's "right" or "good" or "fair," they simply work -- for that
Nothing like invented
law, which just spells out crimes and punishments, tribal traditions worked
well. Tribal traditions worked well for all concerned. For tribal people, the
law isn't a statute written in a book. It's the very fabric of their lives,
they live their tradition which can also be defined as their religion.
The price to be paid for becoming part of the
Wetiko revolution is
detribalization -- the loss of tribal traditions, customs, laws and, finally,
identity. Since the detribalization of the Old World (the Near East, the Far
East, and Europe) began occurring thousands of years before the earliest
written historical records it became part of the Great Forgetting, and as such
it was invisible to the inventers of law.
The inventers of law
reconstructed the evolution of human culture in their imagination: the first
humans were just proto-urbanites -- farmers without farms, villagers without
villages, city dwellers without cities. It is very unlikely they originally
imagined detribalization worldwide. When they looked into the past, they saw
people setting out to build Empire, being already innately inclined toward
Empire. But there is no question that European Imperialists, as many Empire
builders before them had, embraced the concept of detribalization.
Detribalization is a necessary endeavor when destablizing cultures.
When we look into the past no
longer under the influence of the Great Forgetting, we see something very
different: people inadvertently (but systematically) obliterating a highly
successful lifestyle - then attempting to devise a replacement. Multiple early
examples stand out: the Code of
Hammurabi, the Torah, the
Septuagint, the Quran. These
ancient sacred scripture, based on Oral Law,
Oral Torah or
Oral Tradition, were written
down when astute individuals recognized the
encroaching upon their traditional ways of life.
It was upon these
cultural myths that the inventers of law laid their foundations. For 3,000,000
years tribalism worked for people. The tribal life is precious because it
worked for people the way nests work for birds, the way webs work for spiders,
the way burrows work for moles. Tribal traditions were viable.
worked survived, what didn't work perished, leaving behind its fossilized
remains -- irrigation ditches, roads, cities, temples, pyramids. People
everywhere were looking for alternatives to the traditional tribal way of
making a living -- hunting and gathering.
They were looking at
full-time agriculture and settlement, but if their particular experiment didn't
work, they were prepared to let it go -- and they did so again and again. It
used to be considered a great mystery. What became of these ancient builders
who carved strange cities out of the jungles and deserts? Were they whisked
away into another dimension? No, they just quit. They just went back to
something they could count on to work.
the Wetiko experiment different from all of
these was its very quirky belief that the Wetiko
way was the way people were meant to live -- people everywhere, forever, no
matter what. To the Wetiko, it didn't matter
whether it worked. It didn't matter if people liked it. It
didn't matter if people suffered the torments of hell. This was the
required way for people to live so the Empire flourished . This bizarre notion
made it impossible for people to give it up, no matter how badly it worked. If
it doesn't work, then you'll just have to suffer. If it doesn't work, suffer.
And suffer they did.
It's not hard to figure out what made people cling
to the tribal life -- and makes them cling to it wherever it's still found
today. Tribal peoples have their full share of suffering to do, but in the
tribal life, no one suffers unless everyone suffers. There's no class or group
of people who are expected to do the suffering -- and no class or group of
people who are exempt from suffering.
In the tribal life there are no
rulers to speak of; elders or chiefs
-- almost always part-time -- exert influence rather than power. There's
nothing equivalent to a ruling class -- or to a rich or privileged class.
There's nothing equivalent to a working class -- or to a poor or
underprivileged class. If this sounds ideal, well, why shouldn't it be, after
3,000,000 years of evolutionary shaping?
The very first thing to go was
the very thing that made tribal life a success: its social, economic, and
As soon as the
Wetiko revolution began, the
process of division began, between rulers and ruled, rich and poor,
powerful and powerless, masters and slaves. The suffering class had arrived,
and that class (as it would always be) was the masses.
We entered the
historical era and the Great Forgetting was complete. The
tribal life had been gone for thousands
of years. No one in the entire "civilized" world, East or West, remembered a
time when perfectly ordinary people -- the kind of people who now made up the
suffering masses -- lived well, and human society was not divided into those
who are expected to suffer and those who are exempt from
adapted from David Sheen,
invented social law of American
Law, as created by
man, is an attempt to create a body of social rules under which a culture
lives. For a culture to flourish those laws must be
equitable and just. History is littered with the skeletal ruins of
rose initially due to a set of founding traditions or principles in which the
Unfortunately for the
crumbled into dust at some point in their history the law, which may have been oral or
written, that had initially supported and cradled the culture became corrupt. At
that point the laws that caused allowed the culture to sprout and flourish were
no longer enforced or were changed so drastically as to become unjust and
Typically the rulers, leaders or
existing law onerous and failed to either enforce or follow the law. But this
always seemed to happen when the rulers lost touch with the people they
This is true in America today. Those in power no longer feel the need to
obey the laws that created the culture which allowed them to flourish.
those who possess it - a sin of
Bruce Cheney is an example of an
American aristocrat that
feels laws are bothersome and that he is above
the law. While "Dick" is a fairly wealthy man it was determined that when he
shot his hunting partner in the face in February 2006 he did not hold the
proper tag on his hunting license that gave him the right to shoot the quail he
was purported to be hunting. The tag cost seven dollars which
Bruce Cheney could easily have afforded but he felt the law was onerous and
chose to ignore it.
When the First Amendment was passed it only had two
purposes. The first purpose was that there would be no established national
church for the united thirteen states. To say it another way: there would be no
"Church of the US." James Madison clearly articulated this concept of
separation when explaining the First Amendment's protection of religious
liberty. He said that the First Amendment to the Constitution was prompted
because "the people feared one sect might obtain a preeminence, or two combine
together, and establish a religion to which they would compel others to
"If we are not ruled by God we are ruled by tyrants." -
William Blackstone was an English jurist who in the 1760s
wrote a very famous work called Commentaries on the Law of England. By the time
the Declaration of Independence was signed, there were probably more copies of
his Commentaries in America than in Britain. His Commentaries shaped the
perspective of American law at that time. When you read them it is very clear
exactly upon what that law was based. To William Blackstone there were only two
foundations for law, nature and revelation, and he stated clearly that he was
speaking of the "Holy Scripture." Up to the recent past not to have been a
master of William Blackstone's Commentaries would have meant that you would not
have graduated from law school.
In most law schools today almost no one
studies William Blackstone unless he or she is taking a course in the history
of law. We live in a secularized society and in secularized, sociological law.
By sociological law we mean law that has no fixed base but law in which a group
of people decides what is sociologically good for society at the given moment;
and what they arbitrarily decide becomes law. Oliver Wendell Holmes made
totally clear that this was his position.
Frederick Moore Vinson, former
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court said, "Nothing is more certain
in modern society than the principle that there are no absolutes." Those who
hold this position themselves call it sociological law.
As the new
sociological law has moved away from the original base of the Creator giving
inalienable rights it has been the nature that this sociological law has moved
away from the Constitution.
Materialistic thought would never have
produced modern science.
Modern science was
produced on an ethical Christian base. If we think along the lines that
an intelligent Creator created the universe
we can in some measure
understand the universe and there is, therefore, a reason for observation and
experimentation to be optimistically pursued.
Then there was a shift
into materialistic science based on a philosophic change to the materialistic
concept of reality. The materialistic concept of reality would not have
produced the form - freedom balance, and now that it has taken over it cannot
maintain the balance.
wishes to govern the world without regards to the religious needs of the soul,
the experience of the French
Revolution is there to teach us the consequences of such a blunder." -
Joseph Ernest Renan
Lawyers per capita per country:
a lawyer for every 265 people
Brazil has has a lawyer for every 326 people
New Zealand has has a lawyer for every 391 people
Spain has has a
lawyer for every 395 people
Great Britain has has a lawyer for every 401
Italy has has a lawyer for every 488 people
Germany has has a
lawyer for every 593 people
France has has a lawyer for every 1403
America, Brazil, New Zealand, Spain, Great Britain, Italy,
Germany and France have the highest number of lawyers per capita. America has
about 50% of all lawyers, about 37 % of the lawyers of these 8
twisting the law
"The law of
nature, dictated by God himself, is binding in all countries and at all
times; no human laws are of any validity if
contrary to this; and such of
them as are valid derive all force and all their authority from this original."
"The first 100 years of American lawyers were trained on Blackstone." - Judge
"The American legal system has been corrupted
almost beyond recognition. The question of what is
morally right is routinely
sacrificed to what is politically
expedient. The change has come because
legal philosophy has descended
into nihilism." - Judge Edith Jones of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit, speaking to the Federalist Society of Harvard
"Use the courts, use
the judges, use the
constitution of the country, use
its medical societies and its laws to
further our ends. Do not stint in your labor in this direction. And when you
have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation
at will and you can, by careful organization, by constant campaigns about the terrors of
society, by pretense as to your effectiveness, make the
corporatist himself, by his own
appropriation, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of that
nation." - Lavrentiy Pavlovich Beria*, The Communist Textbook
"An increasingly visible and vocal number of
lawyers apparently believe that the strategic use of
anger and incivility will achieve their aims. Others seem uninhibited about
making misstatements to the court or their opponents or destroying or
falsifying evidence. When lawyers cannot
be trusted to observe the fair processes essential
to maintaining the rule of law, how can
we expect the public to respect the process?" - Judge Edith Jones"Judge Edith Jones said that the business about all of the
Founding Fathers being Deists is
misunderstood as they believed in 'faith and reason,' which did not lead to
intolerance. 'This is not a prescription for intolerance or narrow
sectarianism,' Judge Edith Jones continued, 'for unalienable rights were given
by God to all our fellow citizens. Having lost sight of the
moral and religious foundations of the
rule of law, we are vulnerable to the
destruction of our freedom, our equality before the law and our
self-respect. The legal aristocracy have
shed their professional independence for the temptations of materialism
associated with becoming businessmen.
Because law has become a self-avowed
business, pressure mounts to give clients the advice they want to hear, to
pander to the clients' goal through deft manipulation of the law. While the
business mentality produces
certain benefits, like occasional competition to charge clients lower fees,
other adverse effects include advertising
and shameless self-promotion. The legal
system has also been wounded by lawyers who themselves no longer respect the
rule of law. " - Geraldine Hawkins March
"It is decidedly not
[Protestant] Christian to
win at any cost." - Kenneth Starr
In America the
Protestant Christian concept
of justice based on Blackstone has given way to a
concept of justice.
Christian concept of justice proclaims that what
is important is the spirit of the
law and justice is
served by following the spirit of the
law. Of course in this case the
laws themselves must be just.
In the Talmudic/Zaddikim/Imperial Christian
concept of justice what
is important is not the spirit of the
law but the letter of the
In the Talmudic/Zaddikim/Imperial Christian
concept of justice the
idea is to punish whereas in the Protestant Christian concept of
justice the idea is to reform the offender, bringing
the offender back into the social culture as opposed to exiling the offender
from the social culture.
way expresses mercy and
justice while the Talmudic/Zaddikim/Imperial Christian method
expresses wrath and
"The president could ignore or modify existing
executive orders that he and other presidents have issued without disclosing
the new interpretation." -
John R. Elwood, Office of Legal Counsel's deputy assistant attorney
general"Secret law excludes the public from
the deliberative process, promotes
deviant government behavior, and shields official malefactors from
accountability." - Steven Aftergood
"It's a given in our democracy that
laws should be a matter of public record. But the law in this country includes
not just statutes and regulations, which the public can readily access. It also
includes binding legal
made by courts and the executive branch. These
are increasingly being withheld from the public and Congress." - Senator
Russell Dana Feingold
"This combination - the claimed authority not to
comply with the law and to do so secretly - is a terrible abuse of
powers, without limits and without checks. It clearly
is antithetical to our constitutional
democracy." - Dawn Johnsen, former head of the Office of Legal
"One of the charges against
King George III in the
Declaration of Independence was
"altering fundamentally the Forms of our
Governments." The oath of Allegiance for New Citizens requires: "I will
support and defend the Constitution and the laws of the US against all enemies,
foreign and domestic ... and bear true
faith and allegiance to the same." But how can that oath be honored if
American citizens, new and old, do not know the legal standards under which the
government is actually operating at any given moment?" - The Washington Times,
editorial May 12, 2008
civil rightsAlthough the
1964 Civil Rights Act expressly forbids quotas an Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) Alfred Blumrosen* ignored the act and its
statutory prohibition against regulatory
Alfred Blumrosen redefined discrimination to be statistical disparity or
under-utilization of African-Americans demanding that a
quota system was required as
reparations for African-Americans. The Supreme Court accepted this
opinion in Griggs v. Duke Power (1971).
Private employment and promotion quotas are held to be legal because of
the fiction that they are 'voluntarily adopted' and not required by federal
statute. They are required, of course, to avoid federal lawsuits. Alfred
Blumrosen's redefinition of discrimination created
'reverse discrimination.' Whites lose opportunities for racial reasons alone.
This modification of the intent of the law is
precedent"Mass media complains about the current US Supreme
Court's lack of respect for precedent. However, precedent has been changed
throughout history. Mass media seems interested in
keeping only precedents that it likes, even those likely to violate the
original intent of the Constitution.
Franklin Roosevelt loaded the court
with justices who granted him and his successors powers vastly exceeding those that the Constitutional
Convention of 1787 had granted the federal government. This violated about 150
years of precedent. If corporate media is such a great advocate of precedent,
it should favor shrinking federal power to what the earlier precedents were." -
vagueness doctrine 1) A
constitutional rule that requires criminal laws to state explicitly and
definitely what conduct is punishable. Criminal laws that violate this
requirement are said to be void for vagueness. Vagueness doctrine rests on the
due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S.
Constitution. By requiring fair notice of what is punishable and what is not,
vagueness doctrine also helps prevent arbitrary enforcement of the laws.
2) Under vagueness doctrine, a statute is also void for vagueness if a
legislature's delegation of authority to judges and/or administrators is so
extensive that it would lead to arbitrary prosecutions.
The Devil is the Author of
LiesWhen i was young my Methodist Christian
Mother use to tell me "The Devil is the Author of Lies".
Well even back
then i had a hard time beLIEving in the alleged "dEvil".
until recently that my mother's statement began to make more sense.
Once I began a course of study into "Common Law", "Legislation",
"Black's Law Dictionary", "Maritime Admiralty Code", "Rules", "Birth
Certificates", "REGISTRATIONS", "theIRS", "S.I.N. and T.I.N. (S-ocial
I-nsurance N-umber and Taxpayer ID Number)" did i understand.
"Author of Lies" did Authorize a lot of Lies ....
The "dEvil" is the
"id" (latin) id = EGO.
A fictitious overlying matrix has
been created on paper by men who were known as "Pharisees" in the Bible.
ATTORNEYS are the "Pharisees" of today.
ATTORN - latin - to
turn over, LEGIS, LEX, LEGAL, LEGALESE ...
BE AWARE OF THOSE WHO SPEAK
WITH THE FORKED TONGUE OF A SERPENT !
These Pharisees or "Scribes" have
created a matrix of (s)words on paper by inSCRIBING them. This is the black
magic they practice. The Scribes created this
fictitious scripted matrix on vellum
paper of a unipolar imagined
reality simply to control living men and women. This false vellum matrix is
not even a shallow reflection of Natural Reality but
a Nightmare Vision of Psychopathy
superimposed onto Living Breathing
An entirely artificial matrix. Does this
imagined reality have a life of it's own?
Does it think ? Does it act ? If it doesn't think, act, or do anything then it
doesn't have a pulse. It only exists in a fictitious scripted matrix on vellum paper
of a unipolar imagined reality.
We are Living not DEAD. We have a Brain,
a Heart, and Courage, unlike the STRAWMAN,
the T.I.N. man and
the Cowardly Lion.
adapted from Thot Criminill
law and injustice in America"Come and listen to my story
about a man named Jed ..."
When I first moved back to my hometown I
had a run in with the law, well actually three.
My father sold me his
hometown business and my wife had left me shortly before with two young boys -
3 and 5.
Being unfamiliar with all the posted
traffic signs, being away for over seven
years, I happened to not notice one.
I am sitting at the red light
waiting to make a right turn. The cross traffic stops. A local police officer is waiting
at the line. I make my turn when all appears safe. No aggressiveness, no
Oops! I did not
notice the sign with small print about twelve feet up the light post: "No right
turn on red!"
The local police officer writes me a ticket and I pay the
Still being unfamiliar with all the posted
traffic signs I happened to not notice a
A month later I am sitting at a different red light waiting
to make a right turn. The cross traffic
stops. A local police officer is waiting behind me. I make my turn when all
appears safe. No aggressiveness, no traffic
Oops! I did not notice the sign with small print about twelve
feet up the light post: "No right turn on red!"
The local police
officer writes me a ticket and I pay the fine.
About two months later I
am driving down a main arterial street. I approach a green light that turns
yellow as I cross. A local police officer on a motorcycle is approaching the
intersection from the opposite direction. As I pass through the intersection
the motorcycle officer is approximately a football field away. The mortorcycle
officer turns around, pulls me over and writes me a ticket for running a red
light, which I had not done.
I appeared at court on the scheduled
I challenged the officer's version of the event.
I post bail.
I appear at court on the re-scheduled appearance
The officer did not appear. As the officer did not appear the
judge dismissed the case.
About two months later my insurance agent
calls to tell me that my auto insurance has been canceled. I ask why and she
replies that within the last 6 months I had received three moving violations. I
know of the two - what about the third?
I appear once again at the
court proceedings carried on by the judge who dismissed my third ticket. I wait
until all proceedings are completed and ask to approach the bench. I explain to
the judge my predicament and ask if we can review the case.
tells me to return the next day. I return the next
After all other proceedings are
completed the judge calls me to approach the bench.
The judge says the
court paperwork is incomplete as certain court officers have not performed
their duties by carefully recording events.
The judge says that he will
reverse the conviction on the third ticket if I go to
I am stunned as I find out
that I have been convicted, after being told that the infraction was
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a
new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of Life - a rational gnostic mystery religion based on reason which
requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church
buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a
personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit of the
knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has
enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are
spelled out in detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against
individuals due to their religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary the
intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world economic system,
corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military entertainment complex
and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered
behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on
cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.
social mores and values have declined precipitously over the last century as
the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power
rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general through corporate media
by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population
through prior corporate media psychological operations. The results have been
the destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do
not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of
a perfect world. Through distraction and
coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been
directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that
further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of
individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the
capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular
thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be
true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which
may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and
thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to,
re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been
throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the original writer with
the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to
the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved