Language evolves over time.
the word symbol liberal was originally defined as of, pertaining to, or
befitting a freeman, esp. free by birth.
Liberal acts became those
actions appropriate for an adult person of free birth - a lady or a gentleman -
an action inappropriate for a serf, slave, peasant, landless mechanics
(tailors, cobblers, carpenters, blacksmiths, etc.) or a child.
time a connotation developed with use of the word liberal.
A lady or a
as a liberal was liberated from moral constraint, acted licentious, lacked
moral restraint and exercised his or her freedom
to live excessively.
was first used to describe a form of government a liberal government was
defined as a representational form of government, democratic or republican, as
opposed to monarchies.
In an monarchical system the laws coming down
from on high are designed to propitiate or appease
the landed aristocracy
whereas in an ideal representative form of government the laws are designed by
the people with the peoples overall welfare in mind - unlike America
Today those who define themselves as liberal:
favor progress and reform of social
cultural institutions; favor or are in accord with the concept of
maximizing individual freedom; favor freedom of action, esp. with respect to
matters of personal belief or expression; claim to be free from prejudice and
bigotry while being independently-minded, tolerant, unselfish and enlarged in
spirit; claim not to be bound by established traditional orthodox authoritarian
attitudes, conventional ideas, values, dogmas, etc. while being free of bigotry
and claiming to be tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others.
liberal individual may show a willingness to make "liberal" donations; more
than sufficient; abundant; bountiful; ample; profuse amounts freely or
A liberal interpretation of a rule or law is not
strict or rigorous while a liberal interpretation of the
Bible is an interpretation that is not literal.
A liberal education
was defined as an education based on the traditional arts and sciences that
enlarge and discipline the mind making it the master of its own powers - unlike
the educational system of today which is designed to create conforming
automatons - irrespective of the particular business or profession one may
follow whereas today a liberal education connotes
liberation from moral
Although the definition of a liberal as being morally
unrestrained or licentious is obsolete the opponents of
liberalism have done everything in their
power to revive this obsolete definition by
as morally unrestrained or licentious opponents of established moral
Usage: Liberal, Generous. Liberal is freeborn, and generous is
highborn. The former is opposed to the ordinary feelings of a servile state,
and implies largeness of spirit in giving, judging, acting, etc. The latter
expresses that nobleness of soul which in the past was peculiarly appropriate
to those of high rank, - a spirit that goes out of self, and finds its
enjoyment in consulting the feelings and happiness of others. Generosity is
measured by the extent of the sacrifices it makes; liberality, by the warmth of
feeling which it manifests.
"c. 1375; from old French, liberal
"befitting free men, noble, generous;" from Latin, liberalis "noble, generous;"
literally, "pertaining to a free man;" from liber "free;" from
Proto-Indo-European base *leudheros; (Greek, eleutheros "free"), probably
originally "belonging to the people" (though the precise semantic development
is obscure), from *leudho- "people" (evolutions: Old Church Slavonic, ljudu;
Lithuanian, liaudis; Old English, leod; German, Leute "nation, people").
Earliest reference in English is to the liberal arts (Latin, artes liberales),
the seven attainments directed to intellectual enlargement, not immediate
practical purpose, and thus deemed worthy of a free man (the word in this sense
was opposed to servile or mechanical). Sense of "free in bestowing" is from
1387. With a meaning "free from restraint in speech or action" (1490) liberal
was used in the 16th century through the 17 century as a term of reproach. It
revived in a positive sense in the Enlightenment, with a meaning "free from
prejudice, tolerant," which emerged 1776-88. Purely in reference to political
opinion, "tending in favor of freedom and democracy" it dates from 1801, from
the French libéral, originally applied in English by its opponents
(often in French form and with suggestions of foreign lawlessness) to the party
favorable to individual political freedoms. But also (especially in American
politics) tending to mean "favorable to government action to effect social
change," which seems at times to draw more from the religious sense of "free
from prejudicial favor of traditional opinions and established institutions"
(and thus open to new ideas and plans of reform), which dates from 1823." -
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a
new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of Life - a rational religion based on reason which requires no leap of
faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church buildings and in
which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a personal relation
with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit of the knowledge of reality
in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has enveloped the human
spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are spelled out in detail on
this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to their
religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate crime."
This web site
in no way condones violence. To the contrary the intent here is to reduce the
violence that is already occurring due to the international corporate cartels
desire to control the human race. The international corporate cartel already
controls the world economic system, corporate media worldwide, the global
industrial military entertainment complex and is responsible for the collapse
of morals, the elevation of self-centered behavior and the destruction of
global ecosystems. Civilization is based on cooperation. Cooperation does not
occur at the point of a gun.
American social mores and values have
declined precipitously over the last century as the corrupt international
cartel has garnered more and more power. This power rests in the ability to
deceive the populace in general through corporate media by pressing emotional
buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population through prior mass
media psychological operations. The results have been the destruction of the
family and the destruction of social structures that do not adhere to the
corrupt international elites vision of a perfect
world. Through distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the
bulk of the population has been directed toward solutions proposed by the
corrupt international elite that further consolidates their power and which
further their purposes.
All views and opinions presented on this web
site are the views and opinions of individual human men and women that, through
their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational,
insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information presented on this web
site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented as originally
presented in print media which may or may not have originally presented the
facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected,
redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion
and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the
original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions
clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information see:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved