"Evolution has a within as well as a
taking place on
both the physical and psychic levels."
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
"There are two
theories of evolution. There is
the genuine scientific theory; and there is the talk-radio pretend version,
designed not to enlighten but to
deceive and enrage." - Edward Humes
not actually caused by man; he only
exposes organic beings to new conditions of life, and then
nature acts on the
organization and causes it to vary.
Man can and does select the
variations given to him by nature, and thus accumulates them in the desired
Mankind thus adapts
animals and plants for his own benefit or pleasure.
Mankind may do
this methodically, or he may do it subconsciously by
preserving the individuals most
useful or pleasing to him without any intention of altering the
It is certain that he can largely influence the character of
a breed by selecting, in
each successive generation, individual differences so slight as to be
inappreciable except by an educated eye.
subconscious process of
selection has been the great agency in the formation of the most distinct and
useful domestic breeds.
That many breeds produced by man have to a
large extent the character of natural species, is shown by the inextricable
doubts whether many of them are varieties or
There is no reason why the principles which have acted so
efficiently under domestication should not have acted under nature.
the survival of favored individuals
and races, during the constantly recurrent struggle for existence, we see a
powerful and ever acting form of selection.
The struggle for existence
inevitably follows from the high geometrical ratio of increase which is common
to all organic beings.
This high rate of increase is proved by
calculation, by the rapid increase
of many animals and plants during a succession of peculiar seasons, and when
naturalized in new countries.
individuals are born than can possibly survive.
A grain on the
balance may determine which individuals shall live, and which shall die, which
variety or species shall increase in number, and which shall decrease, or
finally become extinct.
As the individuals of the same species come in
all regards into the closest competition with each other, the struggle will
generally be most severe between them; it will be almost equally severe between
the varieties of the same species, and next in severity between the species of
the same genus.
On the other hand the struggle will often be severe
between beings remote in the scale of nature.
The slightest advantage
in certain individuals, at any age or during any season, over those with which
they come into competition, or better adaptation in however slight a degree to
the surrounding physical conditions, will, in the long run,
turn the balance.
With animals having separate sexes,
there will be in most cases a struggle
between the males for the possession of the females.
vigorous males, or those which have
most successfully struggled with their conditions of life, will generally
leave most progeny.
Success will often depend on the males having
special weapons, or means of defense, or
charms; and a slight advantage will lead to victory.
As geology plainly proclaims that each land has undergone
great physical changes, we might have expected to find that organic beings have
varied under nature, in the same way as they have varied under domestication.
Variabilty in nature can only be explained by natural
How Small Genetic Differences Give Rise to Racial
Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial
Man, though acting on external characters alone and
often capriciously, can produce within a short period a great result by adding
up mere individual differences in his
domestic productions; and
everyone admits that species present
Besides such differences,
all naturalists admit that natural
varieties exist, which are considered sufficiently distinct to be worthy of
record in systematic works.
has drawn any clear distinction between
individual differences and slight
varieties; or between more plainly marked varieties and sub-species and
separate continents, and on different parts of the same continent when
divided by barriers of any category, and
on outlying islands, what a
multitude of forms exist, which some experienced
naturalists rank as varieties, others
as geographical races or
sub-species, and others
as distinct, though closely
If then, animals
and plants do vary, let it be ever so slightly or slowly, why should not
variations or individual differences, which are in any way beneficial, be
preserved and accumulated through natural selection, or the
survival of the fittest?
If man can by patience
select variations useful to him, why, under changing and complex conditions of
life, should not variations useful to nature's living products often arise, and
be preserved or selected?
What limit can be put to this power, acting
during long ages and rigidly scrutinizing the whole structure, and habits of
each creature, - favoring the good and rejecting the bad?
I can see no
limit to this power, in slowly and beautifully adapting each form to the most
complex relations of life.
The theory of natural selection, even if we
look no farther than this, appears to be in
the highest degree
As each species tends by its geometrical rate of
reproduction to increase inordinately in number; and as the modified
descendants of each species will be enabled to increase by as much as they
become more diversified in habits and structure, so as to be able to seize on
many and widely different places in the economy of
nature, there will be a constant
tendency in natural selection to preserve the most divergent offspring of any
Hence, during a long continued course of modification, the
slight differences characteristic of varieties of the same species, tend to be
augmented into the greater differences characteristic of the species of the
New and improved varieties
will inevitably supplant and exterminate the older, less improved, and
intermediate varieties; and thus species
are rendered to a large extent defined and distinct(extinct) objects.
Dominant species belonging to
the larger groups within each class tend to give birth to new and dominant
forms; so that each large group tends to become still larger, and
at the same time more
divergent in character.
As all groups cannot thus go
on increasing in size, for the Earth would not hold them, the more dominant
groups beat the less dominant.
This tendency in the
large groups to go on increasing in
size and diverging in character, together with
the inevitable contingency of
much extinction, explains the arrangement of all the forms of life in
groups subordinate to groups, all within a few great classes, which has
prevailed throughout time.
We can to a certain extent understand how it
is that there is so much beauty throughout
nature; this may be largely attributed to the agency of selection.
That beauty, according to our sense of it, is not universal, must be
admitted by everyone who will look at some
venomous snakes, at some
fishes, and at
certain hideous bats with a distorted
resemblance to the human face.
Sexual selection has given the most brilliant
colors, elegant patterns, and other ornaments to the males, and sometimes
to both sexes, of many birds, butterflies, and other animals.
birds it has often rendered the voice of the male musical to the female, as
well as to our ears.
fruit have been rendered conspicuous by
brilliant colors in contrast with the green foliage, in order that the
flowers may be easily seen, visited,
and fertilized by insects, and the
seeds disseminated by
How it comes that certain colors,
sounds, and forms should give pleasure to
man and the lower animals, - that is, how the sense
of beauty in its simplest form was first acquired, -
we do not know any more than how
certain odors and flavors were first rendered agreeable."
hardly be supposed that a false theory would explain, in a satisfactory manner
as does the theory of natural selection, the reason all living things have much
in common, in their chemical
composition, their cellular
structure, their laws of growth, and their
liability to injurious
It has recently been objected that this is an unsafe
method of arguing; but it is a method
used in judging of the common events of life, and has often been used by
the greatest natural
theory of light has thus been arrived at; and
the belief in the revolution
of the Earth on its own axis was until lately supported by hardly any
It is no valid
objection that science as yet throws no light on to the far higher problem of
the essence or origin of life.
We no longer look at an organic being as a savage looks
at a ship, as something wholly beyond his comprehension; when we regard
every production of nature as one which has had a long
history; when we
contemplate every complex structure and instinct as the summing up of many
contrivances, each useful to the possessor, in the same way as
any great mechanical invention is the
summing up of the labor, the experience, the reason, and even the blunders of
numerous workmen; when we thus view each organic being, how far more
interesting does the study of natural history become!
It is interesting
to contemplate a tangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with
birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with
worms crawling through the damp earth, and
to reflect that these
elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent upon
each other in so complex a manner, have
all been produced by Law acting around us.
There is grandeur in this view of life with its several
powers, having been originally breathed by
the Creator into a few forms or into one;
and that, whilst this Earth has gone cycling on according to
the fixed law of gravity, from so
simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been,
and are being, evolved.
I see no good reason why the
views given in this volume should shock the religious feelings of anyone.
It is so easy to hide our ignorance under such expressions
as the "plan of creation," "unity of design," etc., and to think that we give an
explanation when we only restate a fact.
eminent scientists and
theologians who, while accepting the
established findings of science, from the big bang to the evolution of our species,
also perceive creative spirit and
within themselves to the extent that they cannot rule out an ultimate
divine energy and
presence within everything that exists." - Bill McAuliffe
"We could bomb Afghanistan back into the Stone
Age, but what
would that set them back, fifteen minutes?" - Argus
a mutant primate with a strange DNA
When one looks at the chromosomes of humans
and the living great apes (orangutan, gorilla, and
chimpanzee), it is immediately
apparent that there is a great deal of similarity between the number and
overall appearance of the chromosomes across the four different species.
There are differences but the overall similarity is striking.
The following observations can be made about similarities and
differences among the four species.
The great apes have 24 pairs of
chromosomes while humans have only 23 pairs.
Except for differences in
non genetic heterochromatin, chromosomes 6, 13, 19, 21, 22, and X have
identical banding patterns in all four species.
Chromosomes 3, 11, 14,
15, 18, 20, and Y look the same in three of the four species (those three being
gorilla, chimps, and humans), and chromosomes 1, 2p, 2q, 5, 7 - 10, 12, and 16
are alike in two species.
Chromosomes 4 and 17 are different among all
Most of the chromosomal differences among the four species
involve inversions - localities on the chromosome that have been inverted, or
swapped end for end. This is a relatively common occurrence among many species,
and has been documented in humans. An inversion usually does not reduce
Other types of rearrangements include a few translocations
(parts swapped among the chromosomes), and the presence or absence of nucleolar
organizers. All of these differences can be observed to be occurring in modern
The largest single chromosomal rearrangement among the
four species is the unique number of chromosomes (23 pairs) found in humans as
opposed to the great apes (24 pairs).
There are two potential
naturalistic explanations for the
difference in chromosome numbers - either a fusion of two separate chromosomes
occurred in the human line, or a fission of a chromosome occurred among the
The evidence favors a fusion event in the
The chromosomes were apparently joined end to end, and the
ends of chromosomes (called the telomere ) have a distinctive structure from
the rest of the chromosome.
Evidence suggests that the vicinity of
chromosome 2 where the fusion is expected to occur, we see first sequences that
are characteristic of the pre-telomeric region, then a section of telomeric
sequences, and then another section of pre-telomeric sequences.
telomeric section, it is observed that there is a point where instead of being
arranged head to tail, the telomeric repeats suddenly reverse direction -
evidence of fusion.
In chromosomes that have been fused we should see
evidence of two centromeres, the distinctive central part of the chromosome.
Evidence of fusion exists as remnants of the 2p and 2q centromeres
Some may raise the objection that if the fusion was a
naturalistic event, how could the first human ancestor with the fusion have
We have all heard that the horse and the donkey
produce an infertile mule in crossing
because of a different number of chromosomes in the two species.
Variations in chromosome number are known to occur in many different
animal species, and although they sometimes seem to lead to reduced fertility,
this is often not the case.
The last remaining species of wild horse,
Przewalski's (sha-val-skis) Wild Horse has 66 chromosomes while the
domesticated horse has 64 chromosomes. Despite this difference in chromosome
number, Przewalski's Wild Horse and the domesticated horse can be crossed and
do produce fertile offspring which possess 65 chromosomes.
chromosomal rearrangement has recently been discovered, this one shared both by
humans and chimpanzees, but not found in any of the other monkeys or apes that
This rearrangement was the movement of about 100,000 DNA
pairs from human chromosome 1 to the Y chromosome10.
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a
new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
forged a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of the Lumière Infinie - a rational gnostic mystery religion based
on reason which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme
leader, no church buildings and in which each and every individual is
encouraged to develop a personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer
through the pursuit of the knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the
spiritual corruption that has enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The
Truth of the Way of the Lumière Infinie are spelled out in detail on
this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to their
religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate crime."
This web site
in no way condones violence. To the contrary the intent here is to reduce the
violence that is already occurring due to the international corporate cartels
desire to control the human race. The international corporate cartel already
controls the world economic system, corporate media worldwide, the global
industrial military entertainment complex and is responsible for the collapse
of morals, the elevation of self-centered behavior and the destruction of
global ecosystems. Civilization is based on coöperation. Coöperation
does not occur at the point of a gun.
American social mores and values
have declined precipitously over the last century as the corrupt international
cartel has garnered more and more power. This power rests in the ability to
deceive the populace in general through corporate media by pressing emotional
buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population through prior
corporate media psychological operations. The results have been the destruction
of the family and the destruction of social structures that do not adhere to
the corrupt international elites vision of a perfect world. Through distraction
and coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been
directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that
further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of
individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the
capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular
thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be
true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which
may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and
thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to,
re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been
throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the original writer with
the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to
the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For
more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to
use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved