"There are two theories of evolution. There is the genuine
scientific theory; and there
is the talk-radio pretend version, designed not to
enlighten but to
deceive and enrage." - Edward
"Variability is not actually caused by man; he only
unintentionally exposes sacrifice beings to
new conditions of life, and then nature acts on the organization and causes it
to vary. man can and does select the variations given to him by nature, and
thus accumulates them in any desired manner.
Mankind thus adapts
animals and plants for his own benefit or pleasure. Mankind may do this
methodically, or he may do it subconsciously by preserving the
individuals most useful or pleasing to him without any intention of altering
It is certain that he can largely
influence the character of
a breed by selecting, in each successive generation, individual differences so
slight as to be inappreciable except by an educated eye. This
subconscious process of selection has
been the great agency in the formation of the most distinct and useful domestic
breeds. That many breeds produced by man have to a large extent the character
of natural species, is shown by the inextricable doubts whether many of them
are varieties or aboriginally distinct species.
There is no reason why
the principles which have acted so efficiently under domestication should not
have acted under nature. In the survival of favored individuals and
races, during the constantly recurrent struggle for existence, we see a
powerful and ever acting form of selection.
The struggle for existence
inevitably follows from the high geometrical ratio of increase which is common
to all sacrifice beings. This high rate of
increase is proved by calculation,
by the rapid increase of many animals and plants during a succession of
peculiar seasons, and when naturalized in new
More individuals are born than can
possibly survive. A grain in the
balance may determine which
individuals shall live, and which shall die, which variety or species shall
increase in number, and which shall decrease, or finally become
As the individuals of the
same species come in all regards into the closest competition with each other,
the struggle will generally be most severe between them; it will be almost
equally severe between the varieties of the same species, and next in severity
between the species of the same genus.
On the other hand the struggle will often be severe between beings remote
in the scale of nature. The slightest advantage in certain individuals, at any
age or during any season, over those with which they come into competition, or
better adaptation in however slight a
degree to the surrounding physical conditions, will, in the long run, turn the
With animals having
separated sexes, there
will be in most cases a struggle between the males for the possession of the
females. The most vigorous males, or
those which have most successfully struggled with their conditions of life,
will generally leave most progeny. Success will often depend on the
special weapons, or means of
defense, or charms; and a slight advantage will lead to victory.
geology plainly proclaims that each land
has undergone great physical changes, we might have expected to find that
sacrifice beings have varied under nature, in
the same way as they have varied under domestication.
If there has been
any variability under nature, it would be an unaccountable
natural selection had not come into
play. It has often been asserted, but the
assertion is incapable of proof, that the amount of variation under nature is a
strictly limited quantity.
Man, though acting on external characters
alone and often capriciously, can produce within a short period a great result
by adding up mere individual differences
in his domestic productions; and everyone admits that species present
individual differences. But, besides such differences, all
naturalists admit that natural varieties
exist, which are considered sufficiently distinct to be worthy of record in
No one has drawn
any clear distinction between individual differences and slight varieties; or
between more plainly marked varieties and sub-species and species. On separate
continents, and on different parts of the same continent when divided by
barriers of any category, and on outlying islands, what a multitude of forms exist, which
some experienced naturalists rank as
varieties, others as geographical races or sub-species, and others as distinct,
though closely allied species!
If then, animals and plants do vary, let
it be ever so slightly or slowly, why should not variations or individual
differences, which are in any way beneficial, be preserved and accumulated
through natural selection, or the survival of the fittest?
If man can by patience select variations useful to him, why, under
changing and complex conditions of life, should not variations useful to
nature's living products often arise, and be preserved or selected? What limit
can be put to this power, acting during long ages and rigidly scrutinizing the
whole structure, and habits of
each creature, - favoring the
good and rejecting the bad?
I can see no limit to this power, in slowly
and beautifully adapting each form to the most complex relations of life. The
theory of natural selection, even if we
look no farther than this, appears to be in the highest degree
As each species tends by its geometrical rate of
reproduction to increase inordinately in
number; and as the modified
descendants of each species will be enabled to increase by as much as they
become more diversified in habits and
structure, so as to be able to
seize on many and widely different places in the economy of nature, there will be a constant tendency in
natural selection to preserve the most divergent offspring of any one species.
Hence, during a long continued course of modification, the
slight differences characteristic of
varieties of the same species, tend to be augmented into the greater
differences characteristic of the species of the same genus. New and improved
varieties will inevitably supplant and exterminate the older, less improved,
and intermediate varieties; and thus species are rendered to a large extent
defined and distinct objects.
Dominant species belonging to the larger
groups within each class tend to give birth to new and dominant forms; so that
each large group tends to become still larger, and at the same time more
divergent in character. But as all groups cannot thus go on increasing in size,
for the Earth would not hold them, the more dominant groups beat the less
This tendency in the large groups to go on increasing in size
and diverging in character, together
with the inevitable contingency of much
extinction, explains the
arrangement of all the forms of life in groups subordinate to groups, all
within a few great classes, which has prevailed throughout all
"We can to a certain extent understand how it is that there
is so much beauty throughout nature; for this
may be largely attributed to the agency
That beauty, according to our sense of it, is not
universal, must be admitted by everyone who will look at some venomous snakes,
at some fishes, and at certain hideous bats with a distorted resemblance to the
Sexual selection has given the most brilliant colors,
elegant patterns, and other ornaments to the
males, and sometimes to both sexes, of
many birds, butterflies, and other animals. With birds it has often rendered
the voice of the male musical to the
female, as well as to our ears.
fruit have been rendered
conspicuous by brilliant colors in contrast with the green foliage, in order
that the flowers may be easily
seen, visited, and fertilized by insects, and the seeds disseminated by
How it comes that certain colors, sounds, and forms should give
pleasure to man and the lower animals, - that is, how the sense of
beauty in its simplest form was first
acquired, - we do not know any more than how certain odors and flavors were
first rendered agreeable."
"It can hardly be supposed that a false
theory would explain, in so satisfactory a manner as does the theory of natural
selection, the reason all living things have much in common, in their chemical
composition, their cellular structure, their laws of growth,
and their liability to injurious
recently been objected that this is an unsafe method of arguing; but it is a
method used in judging of the common events of life, and has often been used by
the greatest natural
philosophers. The undulatory theory of light has thus been arrived at; and
the belief in the revolution of the
Earth on its own axis was until lately supported by hardly any direct evidence.
It is no valid objection that science as yet throws no light on to the
far higher problem of the essence or origin
"When we no
longer look at an organic being as a savage looks at a ship, as something
wholly beyond his comprehension; when we regard every production of nature as
one which has had a long history; when we contemplate every complex structure
and instinct as the summing up of many contrivances, each useful to the
possessor, in the same way as any great
mechanical invention is the summing up of the labor, the experience, the
reason, and even the blunders of numerous workmen; when we thus view each
organic being, how far more interesting does the study of natural history
"It is interesting to contemplate a tangled bank, clothed with
many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various
insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to
reflect that these
elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent upon
each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by
laws acting around us.
"There is grandeur in this view of life with its several powers,
having been originally breathed by the Creator
into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this Earth has gone cycling on
according to the fixed law of
gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most
wonderful have been, and are being, evolved."
" False facts are
highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but
false views, if supported by some evidence, do little
harm, for everyone takes a
salutary pleasure in proving their falseness; and
when this is done, one path towards
error is closed and the way to truth is often
at the same time opened."
"I see no good reason why
the views given in this volume should shock the religious feelings of anyone.
It is so easy to hide our ignorance under such expressions
as the "plan of creation," "unity of design,"
etc., and to think that we give an explanation when we only restate a
Charles Darwin, naturalist, excerpts from Origin of the
"What is wrong with the idea that God created
evolution as an extremely long process in which life forms change over time and
positive changes, relative to the environment, increase the chances that a life
form will pass on its genes to the next generations. Something tells me God is
not in a hurry." - Steve Paskay
"There are eminent scientists and
theologians who, while accepting the established
findings of science, from the big
bang to the evolution of our species, also
spirit and palpable compassion within
themselves to the extent that they cannot rule out an ultimate
divine energy and
presence within everything that exists." - Bill McAuliffe
analysis suggests that there was an Eve, the mother, and an
Adam, the father, of
all homo sapiens.
We are all just one big happy family ! Versatility is the
hallmark of the primate hand. With minor variations between species,
thirty-five joints accommodate the palm and fingers to branches and objects of
all sizes, shapes, and orientations. Six layers of muscles produce movements
that propel the animals and effect gripping patterns used in maintaining feeding and
resting positions, securing an infant's hold on its
mother, removing parasites from the
fur, catching insects, plucking fruits, extracting foods from their
source, and positioning objects for tactile,
olfactory, and visual scrutiny.
Multiple structural constraints on
mobility stabilize joints in regions that are habitually exposed to stresses
during these positional and manipulatory activities. The locations and
configurations of these constraints vary considerably among species, as do the
relative proportions of hand segments, reflecting the diversity of their
locomotor and feeding patterns.
The key to the versatility of primate hands is to be found in the
nature of the thumb and the fingertips. The thumb is structurally and
functionally differentiated from the rest of the fingers. The tips of all five
digits are relatively broad, with moist, ridged, sensitive palmar pads that are
supported by nails. The advantages of a grasping hand are most apparent in the
levels of the forest where vines,
bushes, and the slender upper and outer branches of the canopy offer the least
purchase to a paw with claws on the fingertips.
Differentiation of the
thumb provides the ability for prehension of objects by one hand. The variety
and skill of prehensile activities depend upon the details of joint
structure, the relative length
of the thumb and fingers, the sensory nerve supply to the distal digital pads,
and the motor control of hand movements by the
the human hand Pounding with hand-held hammer stones has possibly been the
tool-using and tool-making activity with the greatest
frequency and antiquity in hominid
evolution. It is an activity which directs large,
repetitive forces toward the
central region of the palm.
Production of forceful and accurate blows
by a hand-held stone requires control of the hammer stone by firm precision
grips which assure both retention of the stone in the hand and fine adjustments
in its orientation by the thumb and fingers.
Stabilization of objects
that are held in the other hand and pounded by hammer stones in the production
of tools also requires firm precision grips and the ability to vary the
orientation of the stone.
The central region of the modern human palm
is stabilized, buttressed, and protected against intrinsic and extrinsic forces
associated with the grasp and manipulation of stones in pounding by robust
bones and a fat-pad.
A secure grasp and controlled maneuvering of
stones by the thumb, fingers, and palm are facilitated by a unique pattern of
hand proportions and joint-and-muscle configurations that permit cupping of the
hand and the formation of a wide variety of grips.
long thumb and short fingers with broad fingertip pads are able to maneuver the
stones and to hold them firmly, exploiting the leverage of the fingers, or
bracing the stones against the palm.
The unique arrangement of
intrinsic musculature and orientation of joints along the second, third, and
fifth rays, favoring rotation
of the fingers, allow optimal positioning of the thumb and fingers for grasping
and orienting the stones.
Grips that were found through experimentation
to accommodate and control the stones most comfortably and effectively involved
primarily the thumb, index, and third fingers. These included the pad-to-side
and three-jaw-chuck thumb/finger grips and extensions of these grips that
incorporate the palm as a passive buttress. The three-jaw-chuck thumb/finger
grip is most effective both for wielding hammer stones and for throwing stones.
Stones of about 500 grams, comparable in size to tennis balls, are held
by the thumb, index, and third fingers, frequently against the side of the
flexed fourth finger which in turn is buttressed by the flexed fifth finger as
a support. The tip of the thumb and index and third fingertips control the
orientation of the stone and keep it away from the palm, so that the leverage
of these rays is exploited in propelling the stone. The pressure and leverage
of these rays are important factors in controlling the rotation and speed of an
object thrown by the hand.
The modern human hand
structure of the joints along
the fifth ray probably contributes to the effectiveness of the
finger/active-palm squeeze grip, which employs all the fingers and active
convergence of the palm around a cylindrical tool, such as an antler hammer, to
secure it, so that the tool functions as an extension of the hand and/or arm.
The use of small modern tools such as needles and pencils involves the
rotation and translation of
objects by the pads of the fingertips opposed to the tip of the thumb pad,
exploiting a unique human compartmentalization of
primate with a strange DNAWhen one looks at the
chromosomes of humans and the living great apes (orangutan, gorilla, and
chimpanzee), it is immediately
apparent that there is a great deal of similarity between the number and
overall appearance of the chromosomes across the four different species.
There are differences but the overall similarity is striking.
The following observations can be made about similarities and
differences among the four species.
The great apes have 24 pairs of
chromosomes while humans have only 23 pairs.
Except for differences in
non genetic heterochromatin, chromosomes 6, 13, 19, 21, 22, and X have
identical banding patterns in all four species.
Chromosomes 3, 11, 14,
15, 18, 20, and Y look the same in three of the four species (those three being
gorilla, chimps, and humans), and chromosomes 1, 2p, 2q, 5, 7 - 10, 12, and 16
are alike in two species.
Chromosomes 4 and 17 are different among all
Most of the chromosomal differences among the four species
involve inversions - localities on the chromosome that have been inverted, or
swapped end for end. This is a relatively common occurrence among many species,
and has been documented in humans. An inversion usually does not reduce
Other types of rearrangements include a few translocations
(parts swapped among the chromosomes), and the presence or absence of nucleolar
organizers. All of these differences can be observed to be occurring in modern
The largest single chromosomal rearrangement among the
four species is the unique number of chromosomes (23 pairs) found in humans as
opposed to the great apes (24 pairs).
There are two potential naturalistic explanations for the difference in
chromosome numbers - either a fusion of two separate chromosomes occurred in
the human line, or a fission of a chromosome occurred among the apes.
The evidence favors a
fusion event in the human line.
The chromosomes were apparently joined
end to end, and the ends of chromosomes (called the telomere ) have a
distinctive structure from the rest of the chromosome. Evidence suggests that
the vicinity of chromosome 2 where the fusion is expected to occur, we see
first sequences that are characteristic of the pre-telomeric region, then a
section of telomeric sequences, and then another section of pre-telomeric
sequences. In the telomeric section, it is observed that there is a point where
instead of being arranged head to tail, the telomeric repeats suddenly reverse
direction - evidence of fusion.
In chromosomes that have been fused we
should see evidence of two centromeres, the distinctive central part of the
chromosome. Evidence of fusion exists as remnants of the 2p and 2q centromeres
Some may raise the objection that if the fusion was a
naturalistic event, how could the first human ancestor with the fusion have
all heard that the horse and the donkey produce an
infertile mule in crossing because of a
different number of chromosomes in the two species.
chromosome number are known to occur in many different animal species, and
although they sometimes seem to lead to reduced fertility, this is often not
The last remaining species of wild horse, Przewalski's
(sha-val-skis) Wild Horse has 66 chromosomes while the domesticated horse has
64 chromosomes. Despite this difference in chromosome number, Przewalski's Wild
Horse and the domesticated horse can be crossed and do produce fertile
offspring which possess 65 chromosomes.
rearrangement has recently been discovered, this one shared both by humans and
chimpanzees, but not found in any of the other monkeys or apes that were
This rearrangement was the movement of about 100,000
DNA pairs from human chromosome 1
to the Y chromosome10.
back to stacks
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a
new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of Life - a rational gnostic mystery religion based on reason which
requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church
buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a
personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit of the
knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has
enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are
spelled out in detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against
individuals due to their religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary the
intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world economic system,
corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military entertainment complex
and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered
behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on
cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.
social mores and values have declined precipitously over the last century as
the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power
rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general through corporate media
by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population
through prior corporate media psychological operations. The results have been
the destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do
not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of a perfect world.
Through distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the
population has been directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt
international elite that further consolidates their power and which further
All views and opinions presented on this web site are
the views and opinions of individual human men and women that, through their
writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful
and unpopular thought. All factual information presented on this web site is
believed to be true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in
print media which may or may not have originally presented the facts
truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected,
redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion
and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the
original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions
clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic,
scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For
more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to
use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved