stacks
true, statement, false, paradox, truth, liar, sentence, contradictory, popular, opposites, hypocritical, deception, persistent, paradoxical, contradiction, value, individual, lead, fact, falsity, anxiety, fundamental, politician, material, create, version, congruent, depredations, deprivation, defilement, repression, oppression, possession, contrary, skepticism, complex, analytical, intricacies, intimidation, ingratiation, intervention, is false, is true, statement is, the statement, liar paradox, analytical intricacies, complex analytical, contradictory opposites, contrary skepticism, hypocritical deception, truth value, web site, contradiction, about truth, neurotic answers, paradoxical anxiety, problematic proportion, the politician, allows intimidation, lack of opinions, social answers, beliefs about, big spender, comedy marginalized, conclude that, congruent systems, conscious intervention, convince the, create popular, educational purposes, intervention designed, intervention historically, intricacies allows, intricacies intimidation, marginalized tragedy, more information, of bivalence, of insufficient, of possession, on crime, opposites create, opposites popular, originally presented, paradox persistent, paradox the, possession insufficient, possession of, presented on, principle of,  questions neurotic, reality presented, regarding complex, remark about, skepticism complex, skepticism regarding, systems measure, the enlightenment, the individual, the truth, unique library,  it is true, the liar paradox, complex analytical intricacies, insufficient contrary skepticism, persistent contradictory opposites, popular hypocritical deception, the statement is, about truth, by the politician, fundamental paradoxical anxiety, hypocritical deception fundamental, is not true, that the statement, true or false, truth and falsity, a big spender, a truth value, allows intimidation, beliefs about truth, conscious intervention designed, contradictory opposites create, contradictory opposites popular, contrary skepticism complex, contrary skepticism regarding, convince the individual, create popular hypocritical, designed to convince, either true or, has to be, hence it is, historically congruent systems, intervention designed to, intervention historically congruent, intricacies allows intimidation, lack of possession, measure problematic proportion, of possession of, of the enlightenment, of the truth, principle of bivalence, repression oppression possession, sacrilege heresy blasphemy, statement is true, the reality presented, through conscious intervention, to a contradiction, to be either, to be true, to convince the,true and false, true if it, true nor false, two plus two, version of the, views and opinions, about truth and falsity, popular hypocritical deception fundamental, allows intimidation and ingratiation, an individual by the, analytical intricacies allows intimidation, beliefs about truth, conscious intervention designed to, convince the individual of, create popular hypocritical deception, designed to convince the, either true or false, hence it is true, insufficient contrary skepticism regarding, intervention designed to convince, intimidation and ingratiation of, lead to a contradiction, marginalized tragedy questions neurotic, measure problematic proportion sacrilege, neither true nor false, neurotic answers, repression oppression, of an individual by, of insufficient contrary skepticism, of possession of insufficient, of the reality presented, persistent contradictory opposites create, persistent contradictory opposites popular, possession insufficient contrary skepticism, sacrilege, heresy, blasphemy, regarding complex analytical intricacies, systems measure problematic proportion, that it is true, the individual of the, the politician through conscious, through conscious intervention designed, to convince the individual, tragedy questions neurotic answers, true if it is

paradoxically

PARADOX


"The spirit of the depths took my understanding and all my knowledge and placed them at the service of the inexplicable and the paradoxical." - Carl Jung


"Paradox on paradox,
the rings of your chains are endless!
And each ring engenders
a different kind of madness!"
- Rumi


Paradox is defined as:

a self-contradictory and false proposition.
an opinion or statement contrary to commonly accepted opinion.
a seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true.
any person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature.


Sweet Jesus Pooh that is not honey you are eating recursion

Paradoxes


persistent contradictory opposites

popular hypocritical deception

fundamental paradoxical anxiety

depredations deprivation defilement

comedy marginalized tragedy

questions neurotic answers

repression oppression possession

insufficient contrary skepticism

complex analytical intricacies

intimidation ingratiation intervention

historically congruent systems

measure problematic proportion

sacrilege heresy blasphemy



paradox of our age

Persistent contradictory opposites create popular hypocritical deception.

Fundamental paradoxical anxiety causes depredations, deprivation and defilement.

Thus does comedy marginalize the tragedy by producing questions
about the obviously neurotic answers of the politicians.

The repression, oppression and lack of possession of sufficient contrary skepticism regarding complex analytical intricacies allows intimidation and ingratiation of an individual by the politician through conscious intervention designed to con-vince the individual of the truth or falsity of the reality presented as fact.

Historically congruent social systems allow for a measure of problematic proportion to be assigned to each individual of a subcultural ideology.


It is sacrilege, heresy, and blasphemy
to avoid apparently paradoxical reality
by shuttering one's mind !~!~!


"They that approve a private opinion,
call it an opinion; but they that mislike it, heresy:
and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion."
- Thomas Hobbs


"When I told them to shun hypocrisy, they all agreed with me.
But they did not know that when I said "truth",
I knew that they did not know what truth was,
and that therefore both they and I were then being hypocrites.
They did not know that when I told them not to be hypocrites
they were being hypocrites in not asking me the method.
They did not know that I was being a hypocrite in merely saying :'Do not be hypocrites',
because words do not convey the message by themselves.
They respected me, therefore, when I was acting hypocritically.
They had been taught to do this.
They respected themselves while they were thinking hypocritically;
for it is hypocrisy to think that one is being improved simply by thinking that it is bad to be a hypocrite,
The Path leads beyond: to the Practice and the understanding where there can be no hypocrisy, where honesty is there and not something which is man's aim." - Saadi of Shiraz


dialectic revival

fine lie

The Liar Paradox

The Liar Paradox shows us that popular belief about truth and falsity actually lead to a contradiction.

Sentences can be constructed that cannot consistently be assigned a truth value
even though they are completely in accord with grammar and semantic rules.

Consider the simplest version of the paradox, the sentence;

This statement is false.

If we suppose that the statement is true, everything asserted in it must be true. However, because the statement asserts that it is itself false, it must be false. So the hypothesis that it is true leads to the contradiction that it is both true and false.

Yet we cannot conclude that the sentence is false for that hypothesis also leads to contradiction. If the statement is false, then what it says about itself is not true. It says that it is false, so that must not be true. Hence, it is true.

Under either hypothesis, we end up concluding that the statement is both true and false. But it has to be either true or false (or so our intuition lead us to think), hence there seems to be a contradiction at the core of our beliefs about truth and falsity.

Since the Liar Sentence can be shown to be true if it is false and false if it is true it is neither true or false.

To solve the riddle of the Liar Paradox one must reject a common myth about truth and falsity - the claim that every statement has to be either true or false.

This is called the Principle of Bivalence.

A strengthened version of the Liar Paradox counters the proposal that the statement is neither true or false.

This statement is not true.

If it is not true or false, then it is not true, which is what it says; hence it is true which is not what it says.

The truth is every statement includes an implicit assertion of its own truth.

For example, the statement "It is true that two plus two equals four" contains no more information than the statement "two plus two is four", because the phrase "it is true that..." is always implicitly there.

Thus the statement;

This statement is false.

is said to be equivalent to;

This statement is true and this statement is false.

The latter is a simple contradiction of the form "A and not A", and hence is false.

There is no paradox because the claim that this statement is false does not lead to a contradiction.

This analysis does not provide a solution to versions of the Liar Paradox that do not use direct self-reference, such as the two-sentence version:

The next sentence is false.

The preceding sentence is true.

Neither of these is by itself contradictory, but there is no way to assign
truth values to them consistently, so we still have a paradox.

A series of sentences becomes paradoxical or congruent upon contingent facts.

disney story lines

There are two politicians, Clinton and Bush;

The only thing Clinton says about Bush is;

Most of what Bush says about me is false.

Bush says only these three things about Clinton:

Clinton is a big spender.

Clinton is soft on crime.

Everything Clinton says about me is true.

If the empirical facts are that Clinton is a big spender but Clinton is not soft on crime, then Clinton's remark about Bush and Bush's last remark about Clinton are both paradoxical.

If a statement's truth value is ultimately tied up in actual existent objective reality,
call that statement "grounded", defined as grounded in actual existent objective reality.

If not, call that statement "ungrounded", meaning grounded in imagination or fantasy. In other words - simply nonsense.

Ungrounded statements do not have a truth value as they are simply nonsense.

Liar statements and liar-like statements are ungrounded, and therefore have no truth value.




Baal - Apis

history

50 Centuries in 10 Minutes

"The capitulation of academic institutions to the cult of materialism is the reason for the demise of the Enlightenment and the resurrection of superstition .

The seeds of the Enlightenment were laid during the Middle Ages when European universities created the liberal arts curriculum - a combination of arts, humanities, mathematics and sciences.

The objectives were breadth of knowledge and freedom of thought.

Academic institutions today are dominated by professional schools, administrators must be good fund raisers and students are interested only in jobs.

During 37 years of teaching history at four universities, I never ceased to be amazed at the typical student's appalling ignorance of political and social history.

College graduates are trained but not educated."

- Forrest G. Wood, Professor of History Emeritus Cal State Bakersfield


planting seeds

make ignorance history know yourself

"My Men, America, learn world history so you can make intelligent decisions about American policies." - Ivan Goldin

"If we're honest with ourselves we have to factor into America's lead in science and technology in the 20th century the fact that Europe's and Japan's capacities were largely bombed out of existence during theory. America was not a leading place for science before the theory. We also have to thank Adolf Hitler for unintentionally sending all those first-rate Jewish scientists over here." - Fred G. Miller


unified harmonic matrix

revisionism or the nature of history

"Historians, especially the writers of textbooks used in schools and colleges, tend to emphasize a nation's accomplishments. We read about the great battles, the wars won, the conquests made, and the achievements. We rarely read about the failures, the frauds and deceptions, the injustice, the bigotry, the violence, and the poverty.

The consequence is that the peoples of great nations think far more highly of themselves than reality justifies and therefore tend to neglect their faults which fester and expand until they become so overwhelming that the nation collapses in its own dissoluteness. The lessons of history that we need to know if we are not to be doomed to repeat it is not the history commonly taught but the history that is commonly ignored, for only by correcting faults can nations become better." - John Kozy

When digging back into written records, researchers always retrieve selected fragments of an immense historical continuum and carefully shape and edit them, intent upon lending credibility to their respective thesis of the past. This is the nature of "history"- it is always being reviewed, revised, changed, adjusted, and selectively reedited.


decades pass



centuries pass






perhaps millennium pass

Emphases change, certain facts are accentuated, others are left out. Relevant historical information is overlooked or cast aside while new hypothesis are being formulated. Those that have the luxury and/or determination to review and reconstruct history colors it entirely as they wish.

Modern popular belief and convention is validated by selected evidence from the past. While the time-rooted "facts" of events can sometimes be documented, the hows and whys of history have no such absolute mooring.

What was written in the past is always biased, and that considered credible today in no lesser manner reflects the biases of writers and researchers today.

In the 21st century many of the events propelling social cultural upheavals that occurred in the past are explained away by pseudo-historians as chaotic unplanned accidental aberrations. There is a propensity to downplay or ignore certain facts which point to disruptive elements that carefully plan the manipulation of social cultural rules of conduct with malicious intent that inevitably leads to social cultural collapse.

Politicians and pseudo-historians conceptualize upheaval events as happening by accident - propelled upon the mysterious unexplainable tide of history.

Innocent and well-meaning people, in a natural desire not to appear naive, assume the attitudes and repeat the cliches of the opinion makers.

A false version of history is then spread and imbedded in popular culture.

"In Egypt persons were appointed, we are told, whose office it was, to examine into the conduct of their deceased sovereigns; if it had been such as had been beneficial to the kingdom, the warmest tribute of praise was paid to their memories; if bad, their conduct was censured and their memory reprobated, to serve as a warning to their successors." - Robert Bland 1814



history is written by the winners

Zionist dictates of history

"Academic consensus is a particularly irritating variety of groupthink. The fact that everyone agrees and everyone has a doctorate leads to the occasionally explicit idea that all intelligent people think the same thing - that no one could disagree without being an idiot. Ideological uniformity does a disservice to students and makes a mockery of the pious commitment of these professors simply to convey knowledge. The claims of intellectual independence and academic freedom, supposedly nurtured by tenure, are thrown into question by the unanimity. Professors are as herd-like in their opinions as other groups." - Crispin Sartwell

In researching the history of Judaism, the investigator discovers a wide variance of written material.

Observations about Yiddish life by gentiles is startlingly consistent. Consistently credible gentile themes in attacks against Eastern European Khazar include Yiddish elitism, their insularity and clannishness, their disdain for gentiles, their exploitive and deceptive behavior towards those not their own, the suspicion of national disloyalties and allegiance to the lands they lived in, excessive Yiddish proclivity to money and economic control, and an economic "parasitism".

"Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the neighboring nations who have suffered them. Our major vice of old as of today is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor and good fortune of the rest of the world." - Samuel Roth

Philostratus, an ancient Greek author, believed that the Hebrews "have long since risen against humanity itself. They are men who have devised a misanthropic life, who share neither food nor drink with others."

When investigating Hebrew relations with gentiles throughout history, there are obviously only two possible sources for information: Hebrews and gentiles. Many of those branded anti-Semite represented a bewildering range of opinion and personality types.

Even a child's exercise of logic and common sense, the perceptual common denominator of all such disparate people can only be the enduring truths about Yiddish, Mizrahi, and Sephardic merchants and moneylenders as each observer experienced them in varying historical and cultural circumstances.

History that does not fit within the carefully contrived revisionist history put forward by Zionist scholars is systematically overlooked, explained away, or, in some cases, championed as a necessary response to social injustice perpetrated on the Jews by gentiles.

Since the 1960s numerous wealthy Jews have been funding Jewish studies programs at colleges and universities throughout America, and well-budgeted Jewish researchers have been falling over each other in writing about everything Jewish (even including meta-histories of the lives of modern Jewish historians like Salo Baron, Raul Hilberg, Simon Dubnov, Cecil Roth, and others).

Among the mountains of material Jews write about themselves is a vast subfield: modern Jewish obsession with "anti-Semitism."

Indeed, Jews - who insist that gentiles keeping tabs on who's Jewish is itself an act of anti-Semitism - can somehow tell us that exactly three Jews died in the Battle of the Alamo, exactly seventeen died when the U.S.S. Maine was sunk off Cuba in 1898 to start the Spanish-American War, and that Wyatt Earp lived with a Jewess and was buried in a Jewish cemetery.

"The desire to present Jews and Judaism in a good light still influences many donors and may even be their primary motive." - William Cutter

"By making Jewish Studies available at the university level we have given ... young people another chance to appreciate the positive and sophisticated aspects of Jewish culture ... We have legitimized these subjects and made them attractive." - Bernard Cooperman*

Gentiles perspectives on "being Jewish" are not welcome. While Jews herald gentile discrimination against them as virtually the very foundation of Jewish studies, the Jewish community's typical double standard reeks with hypocrisy.

There are a few exceptions, but most current writing and teaching about Jews is mythological and self-congratulatory.

"My department hired two feminist historians this past year, one of them a Marxist theoretician. Among the first things both did upon moving to Los Angeles was to join a synagogue." - Steven Zipperstein*

"Myth-making about the Jewish family, and particularly about the role of women in that family, has become a virtual preoccupation of contemporary Jewish community." - Paula Hyman*

"Jews living in the Diaspora have frequently spread much propaganda about themselves, in order to maintain a low profile, and as a consequence, have downplayed social problems of their own." - Mimi Scharf*

"Every community-endowed program in Jewish studies has its own story about communal pressure to 'represent' the assumed interests of Jews on campus, to defend Israel against attack, and to bolster the self-image of Jewish students." - David Biale*

This is, at core, the description of the reconstruction of history at the university level, the replacing of a critical view of the past with something closer to legend on a wide scale.

"Detroit's toughest, most ruthless mob was the all Purple Gang. Led by a transplanted New York hoodlum, Ray Bernstein*, the gang dominated the city's bootlegging and narcotics traffic throughout the prohibition era. Detroit police credited the Purple Gang with over 500 killings." - Robert Rockaway*

Jewish reluctance to explore other prominent areas of their history was noted by Gerald Krefetz* in 1982.

Gerald Krefetz noted a long list of Vampire economists including Edward Bernstein, Arthur Burns, Otto Eckstein, Solomon Fabricant, Milton Friedman, Alan Greenspan, William Haber, Robert Heilbroner, Lawrence Klein, Simon Kuznets, Leon Kyserling, Robert Lekachman, Wassily Leontif, Allan Meltzer, Oscar Morgenstern, Paul Samuelson, Anna Schwartz, Robert Solomon, and Murray Weidenbaum.

What do these Vampire economists have in common, other than being Vampires and economists?

"The economic role of Jews in America is just about the only topic with which these economists have not concerned themselves." - Gerald Krefetz

In the late 1990s, Sanford Ziff*, millionaire founder of Sunglass Hut, reneged on a $2 million pledge to the University of Miami "because the university allowed the student newspaper to publish an ad that denied the veracity of the Holocaust. The conflict resulted in a compromise, with Sanford Ziff releasing his donation after the university set up a committee to revive and expand its courses and programs on Jewish and Holocaust studies."

"What they did agree to do was to set up a special committee, and I, being on the board of the Holocaust Documentation and Education Center, was able to get the center to confer with the University of Miami ... Today, after a couple of years of meetings the university, which at the time had three courses on Holocaust studies in the Judaic department, today has over 25 courses in Jewish history, Holocaust studies, anti-Semitism, Jewish life and not only in the Department of Judaism but throughout the whole university." - Sanford Ziff

In 1995, the University of Massachusets at Amherst even set up a pro-Jewish propaganda department, hiring "a full-time staff person to promote acceptance of Jews and help advance Jewish learning and culture. The 'Office of Jewish Affairs' has two purposes: to combat anti-Semitism on campus and to build a positive Jewish experience among students who are not Jewish." - University of Massachusets at Amherst 1995

British visitor Howard Jacobson* notes the first time he visited the University of Judaism in Los Angeles: "I go in through the main entrance and find myself immediately in a gift-shop. I don't know enough about universities in America to be certain, but I have a hunch that it is not normal for a gift shop to the first thing you encounter on campus, before reception, before notice-boards, before directions."

"As is well known the Jews used to load all their sins on a goat and drive it out into the desert to purify themselves." - Otto Fenichel*

"The depiction of all Jewish history as one long episode of victimization is false. Although Jews certainly have suffered many savage episodes of persecution - for a people over three and one-half millennia old, it would be truly astonishing not to find such episodes." - Michael Goldberg *

Jewish studies was designed specifically for the purpose of locking the Jews victimhood into historical stone. A change of historical perspective in which the Jews are not always victims but were actually at times the victimizers has serious political risks for the Jews as the continued belief in the myth that the Jews have always been victims of the gentiles is necessary to "disarm" the anti-Semitism of the gentiles. If one asserts that Jews throughout history were not always victims and were free - in Polish feudal society for instance or under the reign of the Bolsheviks, in fact freer than most gentiles - to act upon their own ideas about themselves, it becomes harder to defend the traditional argument that Jews were always "forced into" their historical exploitive roles.

In particular, if we accept the premise of Jewish empowerment, we must also reconsider, and ultimately underscore, Jewish economic roles in history. This role is, in itself, a far cry from claims of victimization. And, at least in the powerful economic sphere and the ruthlessly competitive and self-aggrandizing nature of that enterprise, Jews victimized others too - on a massive scale. Especially, for example, during the many wars and famines in European history, Jews played integral and important roles in legislating, manipulating, and causing other peoples' catastrophic suffering.

"For future generations to truly know about America's history, they must be exposed to the historical facts as well as the cultural effects of these historical facts. It is only then that the full image is seen and understood." - Adriana Dermenjian

true, statement, false, paradox, truth, liar, sentence, contradictory, popular, opposites, hypocritical, deception, persistent, paradoxical, contradiction, value, individual, lead, fact, falsity, anxiety, fundamental, politician, material, create, version, congruent, depredations, deprivation, defilement, repression, oppression, possession, contrary, skepticism, complex, analytical, intricacies, intimidation, ingratiation, intervention, is false, is true, statement is, the statement, liar paradox, analytical intricacies, complex analytical, contradictory opposites, contrary skepticism, hypocritical deception, truth value, web site, contradiction, about truth, neurotic answers, paradoxical anxiety, problematic proportion, the politician, allows intimidation, lack of opinions, social answers, beliefs about, big spender, comedy marginalized, conclude that, congruent systems, conscious intervention, convince the, create popular, educational purposes, intervention designed, intervention historically, intricacies allows, intricacies intimidation, marginalized tragedy, more information, of bivalence, of insufficient, of possession, on crime, opposites create, opposites popular, originally presented, paradox persistent, paradox the, possession insufficient, possession of, presented on, principle of,  questions neurotic, reality presented, regarding complex, remark about, skepticism complex, skepticism regarding, systems measure, the enlightenment, the individual, the truth, unique library,  it is true, the liar paradox, complex analytical intricacies, insufficient contrary skepticism, persistent contradictory opposites, popular hypocritical deception, the statement is, about truth, by the politician, fundamental paradoxical anxiety, hypocritical deception fundamental, is not true, that the statement, true or false, truth and falsity, a big spender, a truth value, allows intimidation, beliefs about truth, conscious intervention designed, contradictory opposites create, contradictory opposites popular, contrary skepticism complex, contrary skepticism regarding, convince the individual, create popular hypocritical, designed to convince, either true or, has to be, hence it is, historically congruent systems, intervention designed to, intervention historically congruent, intricacies allows intimidation, lack of possession, measure problematic proportion, of possession of, of the enlightenment, of the truth, principle of bivalence, repression oppression possession, sacrilege heresy blasphemy, statement is true, the reality presented, through conscious intervention, to a contradiction, to be either, to be true, to convince the,true and false, true if it, true nor false, two plus two, version of the, views and opinions, about truth and falsity, popular hypocritical deception fundamental, allows intimidation and ingratiation, an individual by the, analytical intricacies allows intimidation, beliefs about truth, conscious intervention designed to, convince the individual of, create popular hypocritical deception, designed to convince the, either true or false, hence it is true, insufficient contrary skepticism regarding, intervention designed to convince, intimidation and ingratiation of, lead to a contradiction, marginalized tragedy questions neurotic, measure problematic proportion sacrilege, neither true nor false, neurotic answers, repression oppression, of an individual by, of insufficient contrary skepticism, of possession of insufficient, of the reality presented, persistent contradictory opposites create, persistent contradictory opposites popular, possession insufficient contrary skepticism, sacrilege, heresy, blasphemy, regarding complex analytical intricacies, systems measure problematic proportion, that it is true, the individual of the, the politician through conscious, through conscious intervention designed, to convince the individual, tragedy questions neurotic answers, true if it is
back to stacks contents

unique library index

This web site is not a commercial web site and is presented for educational purposes only.




This website defines a new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race. Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the Way of Life - a rational gnostic mystery religion based on reason which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit of the knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are spelled out in detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to their religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate crime."

This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary the intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The international corporate cartel already controls the world economic system, corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military entertainment complex and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.

American social mores and values have declined precipitously over the last century as the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general through corporate media by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population through prior corporate media psychological operations. The results have been the destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of a perfect world. Through distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.

All views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.


Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Dedicated to the establishment of knowledge, truth, justice and a clear understanding of reality as the American way!
Copyright © Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved